Same Sex Union and Religion

The italian project of a civil union law is provoking extreme reactions in the country, as it was sadly predictable. The Vatican is trying to insist on the inviolability of the family understood as the union between a man and a woman. The Church is unable to understand that discrimination vis-a-vis homosexuals is comparable to any other type of discrimination based on race, or religion.

For a more balanced religious view, listen to Michael J Perry, a Catholic Law Professor at Emory, in his recent book Toward a Theory of Human Rights:

"I expect that within the next generation or two -within the lifetime of our children's children-- the understanding will come to be widely shared, in the world's liberal democracies, that refusing to recognize same-sex unions, if not morally akin to outlawing interracial unions, is nonetheless bereft of any non demeaning rationale.'

Comments

Unknown said…
Let's hope Perry is correct. Unfortunately much of the debate in this issue reverts to unfortunate stereotypes, and ridiculous rhetoric.

In the US, this debate is used as a way to encourage certain segments of the population to vote for conservative candidates. It's an argument which is blown out of proportion, and often leads to some really irresponsible criticism of the function of the American judiciary, especially at the State level.

I wonder if this debate in Italy is taking place because real reform may take place, or is it bein gused as a political tool?
Anonymous said…
Let's hope he's not correct. The idea of a higher law is not at all lacking in rationale. (Not what you want coming from one of your law students, I know, Lorenzo, but I'll escape since I'm anonymous here!)

Popular posts from this blog

A Constitutional Right to Female Sexual Pleasure?

Movie: HOT FUZZ

Head of State: Legal Debat About The UK's Election. Legal Research Society. 22 April 2010